Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:51
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Oy: United Jet Flies Wrong Route Departing SFO, Causes Near Disaster - One Mile at a Time
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why is social media so anti-fee speech, and have they become total BS?
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why didn't Taylor Swift do Taylor Swift (Taylors version)?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Red Sox vs Giants Predictions, Parlay, Picks, Odds for Saturday - Action Network
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Inflation report suggests damage from Trump's tariffs isn't guaranteed - Axios
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Democratic senators rent space at the Kennedy Center to host a Pride event - NPR
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?